General Info
Brand: | Columbia 300 |
Name: | Power Torq |
Reviewed: | September 2021 |
Empty | |
Coverstock Specs | |
---|---|
Name: | ERT Solid |
Type: | Reactive Solid |
Box Finish: | 500 / 2000 SiaAir |
Color: | Sky Blue |
Empty | |
Core Specs | |
Name: | Torq |
Type: | Symmetrical |
RG: | 2.489 |
Diff: | 0.054 |
Int. Diff: | 0.000 |
For details on our standard test layouts, please click here.
The Power Torq brings back an old-school name to the current Columbia 300 lineup. The name and color scheme are where any comparisons to the original end, as this version uses new technology in the weight block and in the coverstock. The new symmetrical Torq weight block, which uses multiple densities to achieve a low RG (2.489″) and a high differential (0.054″), is wrapped in the ERT Solid coverstock. The Power Torq comes out of the box at a rough 500/2000 SiaAir finish, giving it plenty of teeth for heavy oil patterns.
Stroker liked how predictable the Power Torq was at the breakpoint on the heavy oil test pattern. Shots that he missed a little bit right of target had no trouble digging into the oil and getting back to the pocket. He was able to start three boards right with his laydown point compared to the Command Solid. The downlane motion of the Power Torq was smoother than the Dynamic Swing, providing more of a strong arc-shaped motion. Stroker needed to keep the ball in the oil as the fronts and track area started to dry out. He made small parallel moves inside to find more oil when the ball started hitting flat at the pins. From too far inside, his low rev rate and rotation didn’t allow the ball to quite make the corner, so sanding
Already a premium member? Click here to log in.
Columbia 300 Power Torq Comparisons
Click below to see a comparison table of each pair of bowling balls shown:
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Command Solid
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Cuda PowerCOR
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Dynamic Swing
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Dynamic Swing Pearl
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Eruption Pearl
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Madness
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Messenger PowerCOR Pearl
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Messenger PowerCOR Solid
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Power Torq Pearl
- Columbia 300 Power Torq vs. Columbia 300 Speed
To compare the Columbia 300 Power Torq to any other bowling ball(s), please use our Bowling Ball Comparison tool.
Additional Columbia 300 Power Torq Resources
Click here to visit Columbia 300's website to read the manufacturer-supplied information on this ball. Also, see below for the manufacturer-produced promotional video for this ball.
Please remember that our reviews are solely based on our own testing and that you may sometimes find differences between our comments and ratings and the manufacturer's claims. Links to these manufacturer resources are provided here strictly for convenience purposes.